Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41141846›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025

Point-of-care musculoskeletal ultrasound for hemophilic arthropathy: a scoping review of scanning protocols by the Imaging Expert Working Group of the International Prophylaxis Study Group.

Khang T Nguyen, Nihal Bakeer, Annette von Drygalski, Paul Babyn, Helen Pergantou, Amy Dunn, Björn Lundin, Karen Strike

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Khang T NguyenDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Health Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Nihal BakeerDepartment of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Annette von DrygalskiDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Paul BabynDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Saskatchewan and Saskatchewan Health Authority Saskatoon City Hospital, Saskatoon, Canada.
Helen PergantouPediatric Hemophilia Centre/Hemostatis and Thrombosis Unit, Aghia Sophia Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Amy DunnDivision of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology & Marrow Transplant, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Björn LundinCenter for Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund/Malmö, Sweden.
Karen StrikeHamilton Niagara Regional Hemophilia Program, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: People with hemophilia (PwH) or von Willebrand disease (VWD) are at risk of joint bleeding, which can lead to hemophilic arthropathy. Point-of-care musculoskeletal ultrasound (POC-MSKUS) is increasingly used to detect joint bleeds, but a comprehensive compilation of available independent scanning protocols and their respective measurement properties is missing. Objectives: This study aimed to identify all existing POC-MSKUS scanning protocols and their reported measurement properties in PwH or people with VWD. Methods: A scoping review was conducted using Embase, MEDLINE, and CINAHL (March 2025). Studies were included if they were peer-reviewed; published in English; used an experimental, observational, or review design; and examined POC-MSKUS for joint disease in children or adults with hemophilia A, hemophilia B, or VWD. Extracted data included scanning protocol characteristics and measurement properties such as reliability (interrater and intrarater), construct validity (convergent and known groups), criterion validity (concurrent and predictive), and responsiveness. Results: Of 926 identified studies, 134 met the inclusion criteria (3 systematic reviews, 7 experimental studies, 75 observational studies, 39 narrative reviews, and 10 studies using other acceptable designs). Thirteen POC-MSKUS scanning protocols were identified. Among the 70 studies assessing measurement properties, reliability was reported in 12 studies, construct validity in 43 studies, criterion validity in 20 studies, and responsiveness in 5 studies. Predictive validity (2 studies) and responsiveness were the least reported properties. Conclusion: Several POC-MSKUS scanning protocols exist, with predictive validity and responsiveness being the least established measurement properties. Future research should focus on prospective and experimental studies to establish these properties in POC-MSKUS protocols for PwH and people with VWD.

Indexed as

hemarthrosishemophiliapoint-of-care testingultrasonographyvon Willebrand disease

Identifiers

PMID41141846
PMCPMC12547463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.