Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41141764›Full record

ReviewACS omega2025

Ugi and Groebke-Blackburn-Bienaymé Reactions in Medicinal Chemistry: An Outlook on New Bioactive Compounds.

Gustavo Barbosa-Reis, Julia Lavorenti, Bruna Lorentz Alves, Diogo Oliveira-Silva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gustavo Barbosa-ReisDepartment of Chemistry - Institute of Environmental, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Diadema Campus, 275 Artur Riedel St., Diadema 09972-270, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0650-5603
Julia LavorentiDepartment of Chemistry - Institute of Environmental, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Diadema Campus, 275 Artur Riedel St., Diadema 09972-270, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6151-7879
Bruna Lorentz AlvesDepartment of Chemistry - Institute of Environmental, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Diadema Campus, 275 Artur Riedel St., Diadema 09972-270, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9390-7790
Diogo Oliveira-SilvaDepartment of Chemistry - Institute of Environmental, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Diadema Campus, 275 Artur Riedel St., Diadema 09972-270, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0046-3502

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The FDA has approved 174 new molecular entities over the last 5 years. In 2023, the anticancer and infectious disease areas represented an impressive percentage of drug approvals, 24% and 9%, respectively, following the decade's trends. This reflects the pharmaceutical industry's increasing demand for novel compounds, particularly in these fields. Isocyanide-based multicomponent reactions, such as Ugi and Groebke-Blackburn-Bienaymé reactions, stand out for their versatility in obtaining different bioactive scaffolds using simpler starting materials. A large array of complex scaffold molecules can be obtained by using a multicomponent synthesis step. For this reason, this mini-review summarizes some recent works that employed this approach to afford new anticancer, antiviral, antimicrobial, and antiparasitic compounds. In each case, how the modifications impact activity or cytotoxicity is discussed. Also, the possible gaps that should be evaluated in further work are highlighted to inspire the design of new compounds.

Identifiers

PMID41141764
PMCPMC12547554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.