ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Development and comparative evaluation of machine learning models for predicting lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in gastrointestinal cancer patients using multicenter longitudinal clinical data.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) represents a prevalent and formidable complication among patients with gastrointestinal malignancies, exerting a profound impact on both prognosis and quality of life. Owing to its intricate pathogenesis, the development of a precise risk prediction model is imperative for advancing clinical strategies in prevention and therapeutic intervention. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled patients with gastrointestinal malignancies using multicenter, longitudinal clinical data obtained from three tertiary medical centers between 2020 and 2024. A total of 34 variables were extracted, encompassing demographic profiles, clinical parameters, tumor-specific characteristics, and laboratory indices. To identify independent predictors of DVT, both univariate and multivariate analyses were initially performed. Four machine learning algorithms-Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN)-were subsequently constructed to predict DVT risk. Model performance was rigorously assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, Brier scores, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Internal validation was conducted via ten-fold cross-validation, while an independent external cohort was employed to evaluate model generalizability. To elucidate the underlying predictive mechanisms, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was carried out. Results: Through a combination of univariate and multivariate analyses alongside four machine learning algorithms, surgery, prolonged immobilization, central venous catheterization, radiotherapy, distant metastasis, and chemotherapy emerged as significant high-risk factors for DVT. All four predictive models exhibited robust performance, with the XGBoost model demonstrating superior discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. Findings from the external validation cohort further substantiated its stability and generalizability. SHAP analysis illuminated the relative contributions and directional influences of pivotal variables within the predictive framework. Conclusion: Machine learning models derived from multicenter, longitudinal clinical datasets offer robust predictive capabilities for assessing DVT risk in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. These models furnish clinicians with individualized risk stratification tools, facilitating the refinement of preventive strategies and the enhancement of clinical decision-making, ultimately contributing to improved patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.