ReviewTranslational pediatrics2025
Expanding the use of 3D printing in congenital heart surgery.
Review in Translational pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The 3D printed cardiac model: a potential tool in transcatheter complex atrial septal defect closure-a case report study.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
- Feasibility of 3D echocardiography-CT/CMR fusion to create atrioventricular valve-integrated 3D printed heart models in complex congenital heart disease: greater incremental benefit for surgeons than cardiac imagers.3D printing in medicine · 2026Article
- Scientific Publication Trend: Using Advanced Technologies in Cardiovascular Disease Research in theJournal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) printing has evolved the way patients with complex congenital heart disease are managed. The main applications of 3D printing in congenital heart surgery are (I) clinical decision making/surgical planning; (II) practice/simulation; (III) education. This paper explores these applications and how they can benefit clinicians involved in the care of patients with complex congenital heart disease. 3D printing is particularly useful in clinical decision making for patients with complex diseases, especially when there is ambiguity over whether a biventricular repair is possible versus univentricular palliation. This paper provides a summary of the evidence that supports its use and in which subset of patients this technology is most beneficial. Beyond surgical planning, 3D models support the safe development and rehearsal of novel surgical techniques and provide a platform for simulation-based training. Studies have shown that simulation using 3D models improves technical performance and procedural efficiency, supporting their integration into training curricula, particularly in resource-limited settings. Furthermore, 3D models enhance education for medical professionals and aid communication with patients and families, facilitating shared decision-making. Although high-quality evidence supporting 3D printing is limited, in the clinical management of patients with complex congenital heart disease, 3D printing should be considered in complex cases. This clinical benefit is being supported by the availability of reimbursement codes in some countries. As the technology advances, 3D printing may become a core component in congenital heart surgery. While further evidence is needed to fully quantify its clinical benefit, current data and global experience strongly support its integration into care pathways for selected patients, training programs, and education strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.