ReviewTranslational pediatrics2025
A scoping review on adaptations incorporated into decision aids for children and adolescents (C&A) cohorts.
Review in Translational pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) is especially important for children and adolescents (C&A) as it promotes cooperation between patients, families, and healthcare professionals, enhances patient satisfaction and health outcomes. By enabling C&A to actively engage in their care, it ensures that their values and preferences taken into account. To enhance this collaborative process, decision aids (DA) serve as a valuable tool. It is crucial to note the need for tailoring these DAs to meet the unique demands of C&A during these SDM processes. However, data are scarce regarding the adaptations necessary for DAs geared towards C&A health-related decision-making. We aim to bridge this knowledge gap and provide insights into specific DA adaptations that can benefit the C&A population during their healthcare decision-making process. Methods: The literature review was conducted systematically in PubMed and MEDLINE(Ovid) electronic databases. References of the identified studies were reviewed, along with hand-searches of relevant journals. English language publications that were eligible for inclusion were reviewed. Three aspects of adaptations were the focus of this review: namely (I) technical adaptation; (II) linguistic/numerical/visual adaptations and lastly; (III) content adaptation. Results: Ultimately, from an initial search of 37,422 articles, we retrieved and reviewed eighty full-text articles, and eight were included in this scoping review. Five were dyadic DAs and the rest triadic DAs. The DAs were an array of electronic-based, paper-booklet and model-based format. Four outcomes of technical adaptations were identified: (I) interactivity and ease of use, (II) simplified information presentation, (III) user category versions, and (IV) enhanced engagement. Linguistic/numerical/visual adaptations included two outcomes of: (I) health-literacy appropriateness, and (II) attractive non-textual presentation. Finally, under Content adaptation, two outcomes were identified: (I) disclosure of sensitive topics and (II) personalized content. Conclusions: In summary, various forms of C&A adaptations were evident across all surveyed DAs. Most frequently encountered C&A adaptations were in the form of technical adaptations followed by linguistic, numerical, or visual modifications. Considerations of which types of adaptations to incorporate in a DA designed for C&A may give added value to the overall DA design, which in turn could assist the decision-making process. Further research to explore the performance of these C&A adapted DAs in achieving SDM is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.