ArticleTranslational pediatrics2025
Clinical evaluation of long-term efficacy of house dust mite subcutaneous immunotherapy in children with allergic asthma.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only cause-specific treatment for allergic asthma (AA), and the efficacy of AIT has been widely recognized. Most previous studies have focused on evaluating the efficacy of AIT up to 10 years after treatment. Few studies have reported the long-term efficacy (more than 10 years after treatment) of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) in children with AA who were sensitized to a single allergen or multiple allergens. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term efficacy of house dust mite (HDM) SCIT in children with single and multiple allergies, and to provide reliable data on the long-term efficacy of SCIT in children with AA. Methods: Forty-six AA children (aged 5-14 years) who had completed 3 years of standardized HDM SCIT were assigned to a monosensitization group (n=22) or a polysensitization group (n=24). The asthma symptom score (ASS), rhinitis symptom score (RSS), total symptom score (TSS), visual analog scale (VAS), Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), and adverse reactions were evaluated before treatment, at the end of treatment and at 7, 10, and 15 years after SCIT. Results: Compared with baseline scores, the ASS, RSS, TSS, VAS, PAQLQ, and ACQ of all patients were significantly improved at the end of SCIT and at 7, 10, and 15 years after SCIT. Moreover, there was no significant difference between the monosensitization group and the polysensitization group. Conclusions: The significant clinical outcomes achieved by SCIT persisted for 15 years after treatment was completed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.