ArticleTranslational pediatrics2025
Laryngeal mask versus intubation on adverse reactions in pediatric retinoblastoma patients.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Children undergoing enucleation surgery for conditions such as retinoblastoma require general anesthesia with airway management techniques. Both laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and endotracheal intubation (ETT) are commonly used in pediatric anesthesia, but their comparative efficacy and safety in this specific context remain unclear. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of LMA versus ETT in children undergoing enucleation surgery. Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients in Peking University People's Hospital from 2007 to 2020 who underwent eye removal surgery was included in our study. Fifty-eight eligible patients were divided into Group A (ETT, n=35) and Group B (LMA, n=23) according to the type of anesthesia. The patients' demographic data were recorded and analyzed. The heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were retrieved at different time points to compare the efficacy between LMA and ETT. Perioperative complications were recorded to compare the safety between LMA and ETT. Results: In total, 39.66% (23/58) of the patients received LMA. Patients with LMA placement in Group B had a significantly lower HR before skin incision than those in Group A (P=0.02). In Group B, one patient experienced laryngeal spasm after the removal of the laryngeal mask, and one patient experienced a second attempt of LMA insertion due to poor alignment of the laryngeal mask at the first time. Conclusions: LMA intubation provides more stable perioperative conditions for children undergoing eye enucleation surgery. LMA intubation does not generate more adverse events than ETT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.