ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2025
Training load and pain response during progressive resistance training in patients with hip osteoarthritis in the PROHIP trial.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04070027 (Progressive Resistance Training Versus Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With End-stage Hip Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Progressive Resistance Training Versus Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With End-stage Hip Osteoarthritis (PROHIP): A Multicentre, Parallel-group, Randomised Controlled Superiority Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe training load and repetitions, illustrate the pre- and post-exercise hip pain intensity trajectories throughout a 12-week progressive resistance training (PRT) program, and evaluate the difference in change in pre-exercise hip pain intensity between high and moderate-to-low adherence to PRT among individuals with severe hip osteoarthritis and indication for surgery. Design: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial reporting data only from participants who were enrolled from September 2019 through June 2021 from four orthopedic departments in Denmark and assigned to PRT. Patient-reported hip pain intensity at rest was measured before and after each session using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). High adherence was defined as attending at least 18 of 24 scheduled sessions. Results: A total of 55 participants (mean age 67.7 years and 51 % females) received PRT. Training load increased while repetitions decreased from week 1 to week 12. The mean pre-exercise NRS decreased from 3.18 points at baseline to 2.13 points at 12-weeks (difference, 1.05 points [95%CI 0.46, 1.65]). The mean post-exercise NRS decreased from 2.87 points at baseline to 2.04 points at 12-weeks, (difference, 0.83 points [95%CI 0.30, 1.37]). There was no significant difference in mean change in pre-exercise NRS scores between high and moderate-to-low adherence (group difference, 1.08 points [95%CI -0.85, 3.02]). Conclusions: Individuals with severe hip osteoarthritis and indication for surgery can exercise at progressively higher intensity while maintaining low hip pain intensity. High adherence did not result in greater pain relief. Clinical trial registration number: NCT04070027.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.