Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41141645›Full record

ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2025

Training load and pain response during progressive resistance training in patients with hip osteoarthritis in the PROHIP trial.

Emma Smed Bryld, Laura Christiansen, Kim Gordon Ingwersen, Søren Overgaard, Lone Ramer Mikkelsen, Inger Mechlenburg, Thomas Frydendal

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04070027 (Progressive Resistance Training Versus Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With End-stage Hip Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04070027 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Progressive Resistance Training Versus Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With End-stage Hip Osteoarthritis (PROHIP): A Multicentre, Parallel-group, Randomised Controlled Superiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorVejle HospitalRan2019 to 2026Enrolled109ConditionsHip OsteoarthritisArmsTotal Hip Arthroplasty, Progressive Resistance Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emma Smed BryldDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Laura ChristiansenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kim Gordon IngwersenDepartment of Physiotherapy, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.
Søren OvergaardDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lone Ramer MikkelsenUniversity Clinic for Orthopedic Pathways (UCOP), Elective Surgery Centre, Regional Hospital Silkeborg, Silkeborg, Denmark.
Inger MechlenburgDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Thomas FrydendalDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To describe training load and repetitions, illustrate the pre- and post-exercise hip pain intensity trajectories throughout a 12-week progressive resistance training (PRT) program, and evaluate the difference in change in pre-exercise hip pain intensity between high and moderate-to-low adherence to PRT among individuals with severe hip osteoarthritis and indication for surgery. Design: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial reporting data only from participants who were enrolled from September 2019 through June 2021 from four orthopedic departments in Denmark and assigned to PRT. Patient-reported hip pain intensity at rest was measured before and after each session using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). High adherence was defined as attending at least 18 of 24 scheduled sessions. Results: A total of 55 participants (mean age 67.7 years and 51 ​% females) received PRT. Training load increased while repetitions decreased from week 1 to week 12. The mean pre-exercise NRS decreased from 3.18 points at baseline to 2.13 points at 12-weeks (difference, 1.05 points [95%CI 0.46, 1.65]). The mean post-exercise NRS decreased from 2.87 points at baseline to 2.04 points at 12-weeks, (difference, 0.83 points [95%CI 0.30, 1.37]). There was no significant difference in mean change in pre-exercise NRS scores between high and moderate-to-low adherence (group difference, 1.08 points [95%CI -0.85, 3.02]). Conclusions: Individuals with severe hip osteoarthritis and indication for surgery can exercise at progressively higher intensity while maintaining low hip pain intensity. High adherence did not result in greater pain relief. Clinical trial registration number: NCT04070027.

Indexed as

ExerciseHip osteoarthritisHip painNumerical rating scaleResistance training

Identifiers

PMID41141645
PMCPMC12547905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.