ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025
Inferior Pole Adipose Dermal Flap for Breast Reconstruction: A Novel Oncoplastic Technique for Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Essentials for optimizing outcomes in oncoplastic breast reconstruction.Gland surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer is a prevalent malignancy among women, and advancements in treatment have shifted focus to enhancing both survival and quality of life. Oncoplastic surgery integrates oncological safety with aesthetic considerations. Objectives: The authors of this study aim to evaluate the efficacy of the inferior pole adipose dermal (IPAD) flap for lower pole reconstruction in breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving patients who underwent BCS with IPAD flap reconstruction. Inclusion criteria comprised female patients over 18 years with at least 12 months of follow-up. Data collected included demographics, clinical history, surgical details, complications, and patient satisfaction, assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results: The study included 12 patients with a mean age of 52.7 years and a mean BMI of 28. Four patients (33.3%) required integration of a perforator flap for additional volume. No major complications, such as infections or flap necrosis, were observed. Minor complications included lower pole retraction (16.6%) and inferior dehiscence (8.3%). Patient satisfaction was high (VAS 7.5), and aesthetic outcomes were rated positively by surgeons (7.2). Adjuvant radiotherapy did not adversely affect flap viability. Conclusions: The IPAD flap may be a viable and effective technique for lower pole reconstruction in BCS. This technique is particularly beneficial for patients with adequate breast volume. The authors of this study underscore the importance of personalized surgical planning and a multidisciplinary approach to optimizing breast cancer treatment. Level of Evidence 4 Therapeutic:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.