ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for traumatic and non-traumatic rupture of the descending thoracic aorta: A 15-year single-centre experience.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ruptures of the descending thoracic aorta are life-threatening emergencies with traumatic and non-traumatic causes. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become a key treatment, but long-term outcome data remain limited. This study aimed to review our experience with TEVAR in patients with traumatic or non-traumatic rupture and identify factors associated with post-TEVAR survival. Methods: Between 2001 and 2016, 56 patients (21 with traumatic rupture and 35 with non-traumatic rupture) underwent TEVAR at the West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, Germany. Data examined included demographics, comorbidities, biomarker levels, imaging results, intervention details, complications, and outcomes (30 days and follow-up). Results: Patients with non-traumatic rupture were significantly older and had more cardiovascular comorbidities. Patients with traumatic rupture presented more frequently with hemodynamic shock and mediastinal hematoma (47 %). Left subclavian artery coverage was more common in traumatic rupture (57.1 % vs. 18.2 %). Long-term aortic complications were more frequent in non-traumatic rupture (33.3 % vs. 0 %). Patients with traumatic rupture showed significantly longer survival. The overall 30-day mortality was 14.3 % (4.7 % in traumatic rupture patients vs. 20 % in non-traumatic rupture patients) and long-term mortality was 64.5 % (33.3 % in traumatic rupture patients vs. 84.2 % in non-traumatic rupture patients). Age, hypertension, complications, and the aetiology of aortic rupture significantly affected survival. Conclusion: Patients with traumatic aortic rupture are younger, have healthier vessels, and show better outcomes after TEVAR. This may allow longer follow-up intervals in selected cases, while closer monitoring remains necessary for non-traumatic ruptures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.