ArticleHealth science reports2025
Monitoring and Assessment of Circulating Tumor DNA in Cancers Using Ultrarapid Sensitivity as an Innovative Practice.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individualized Longitudinal ctDNA Monitoring in Melanoma Using Multiplexed USE-PCR.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Article
- Liquid biopsy in colorectal cancer: redefining surgical decision-making.Updates in surgery · 2026Review
- Advancements in CRISPR/Cas Technologies for Sensitive Cancer Detection: Mechanisms, Platforms, and Clinical Translation Roadmap.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Genetic Landscape of Colorectal Cancer: From Molecular Alterations to Therapeutic Decision Pathways.Cancers · 2026Review
- ctDNA in the Management of Resectable & Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions.OncoTargets and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Liquid biopsy with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has rapidly emerged as a new paradigm for assessing tumor burden, genetic heterogeneity, and therapeutic response in a real-time, noninvasive manner. However, ctDNA is often visually low (sometimes < 0.1% of the total circulating cell-free DNA), creating a significant challenge for reliable detection (especially for early-stage disease and minimal residual disease). Discussion: New technologies for structural variant (SV)-based ctDNA assays, nanomaterial-based electrochemical sensors, magnetic nano-electrode platforms, and fragment-enriched library preparation have improved sensitivity to attomolar concentrations and less in some populations. In some cancers, ctDNA may provide early evidence of recurrence (i.e., > 1 year) before being clinically evident using traditional metrics. These technologies allow for unprecedented opportunities and sensitivity for early detection, monitoring of treatment response, and early detection of molecular recurrence. Nevertheless, a barrier remains for widespread clinical application owing to pre-analytical technique variability, analytical platform variability, cost, and the necessity of large-scale, prospective trials. Conclusion: This study will analyze new innovative technology-based ultrasensitive ctDNA assay detection and future research and clinical applications for breast, colorectal, lung, lymphoid, and gastroesophageal cancers, and studies assessing ctDNA for monitoring treatment. Prospects for ctDNA detection utilizing multiplexed CRISPR-Cas ctDNA assays, microfluidic point-of-care (POC) devices, and AI-based error suppression methods may be the next horizon for ctDNA liquid biopsy technology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.