Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41141466›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2025

Monitoring and Assessment of Circulating Tumor DNA in Cancers Using Ultrarapid Sensitivity as an Innovative Practice.

Md Mohiuddin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Md MohiuddinDepartment of Pharmacy Southeast University Dhaka Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7313-8655

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Liquid biopsy with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has rapidly emerged as a new paradigm for assessing tumor burden, genetic heterogeneity, and therapeutic response in a real-time, noninvasive manner. However, ctDNA is often visually low (sometimes < 0.1% of the total circulating cell-free DNA), creating a significant challenge for reliable detection (especially for early-stage disease and minimal residual disease). Discussion: New technologies for structural variant (SV)-based ctDNA assays, nanomaterial-based electrochemical sensors, magnetic nano-electrode platforms, and fragment-enriched library preparation have improved sensitivity to attomolar concentrations and less in some populations. In some cancers, ctDNA may provide early evidence of recurrence (i.e., > 1 year) before being clinically evident using traditional metrics. These technologies allow for unprecedented opportunities and sensitivity for early detection, monitoring of treatment response, and early detection of molecular recurrence. Nevertheless, a barrier remains for widespread clinical application owing to pre-analytical technique variability, analytical platform variability, cost, and the necessity of large-scale, prospective trials. Conclusion: This study will analyze new innovative technology-based ultrasensitive ctDNA assay detection and future research and clinical applications for breast, colorectal, lung, lymphoid, and gastroesophageal cancers, and studies assessing ctDNA for monitoring treatment. Prospects for ctDNA detection utilizing multiplexed CRISPR-Cas ctDNA assays, microfluidic point-of-care (POC) devices, and AI-based error suppression methods may be the next horizon for ctDNA liquid biopsy technology.

Identifiers

PMID41141466
PMCPMC12550271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.