ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Infective Endocarditis and Antimicrobial Timing: A Case for Delay?
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In patients with suspected infective endocarditis (IE), current guidelines recommend prompt initiation of empiric antimicrobial treatment after obtaining blood cultures. However, the clinical benefit of immediate treatment in hemodynamically stable patients remains uncertain. This study assessed the impact of deferring antimicrobial treatment in patients with suspected IE. Methods: We conducted a multicenter cohort study of adult patients with bacteremia and clinical suspicion of IE from 2 university hospitals (2015-24). Patients presenting with sepsis, intensive care unit admission, neutropenia, or a clearly identifiably focus other than IE were excluded. All cases were adjudicated by a dedicated Endocarditis Team as either IE or not IE. The primary outcome for all episodes was 30-day mortality; for confirmed IE cases, the composite outcome included 30-day mortality, new embolic events, or new bone and joint infection. Results: Among 1230 episodes, empirical antimicrobial treatment was initiated immediately (Group I) after blood culture collection in 675 episodes (55%) and deferred until preliminary blood culture results (Group D) in 555 episodes (45%). Thirty-day mortality was 5% (59 episodes), with no difference between Groups I and D (5% vs 5%; Conclusions: In clinically stable patients with suspected IE, deferring antimicrobial treatment until available blood culture results was not associated with worse clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.