ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2025
The Utility of Plain Radiography in Flexor Tendon and Digital Nerve Lacerations of the Hand.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Physical examination during hand lacerations may sufficiently identify flexor tendon and digital nerve injuries, but radiographs are often acquired to rule out fracture, dislocation, or foreign body. This study examines the impact of plain radiography in the management of patients with isolated sharp injuries of the hand. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive adult patients with flexor tendon and/or digital nerve lacerations who presented during 2019-2021 to a tertiary referral urgent care hand clinic. Charts were reviewed to determine the presence of bony injury or foreign body and whether radiographic evaluation affected clinical management. Comparisons were made among patients with varying mechanisms. Results: One hundred eighty-five patients met inclusion criteria, with the mechanisms of sharp laceration (83.2%), saw injury (11.9%), and crush injury (4.9%). All patients with saw and crush injuries received radiographs compared with 45.5% in the sharp laceration group. Bony injuries and/or foreign bodies were found in 63.6% and 66.7% of cases in the saw and crush groups, respectively. In comparison, no patients with sharp lacerations had a bony injury, and one patient had a foreign body from glass shattering that was removed in the emergency department. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the utility of plain radiography in sharp lacerations may be limited to clinical contexts in which a retained foreign body is suspected. We recommend only selective use of radiography in isolated sharp lacerations of the hand; however, radiographs regularly altered management in injuries because of saw and crush mechanisms and would be warranted in these settings. Clinical relevance: This study supports the judicious use of radiography in simple sharp lacerations of the volar hand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.