ArticleJournal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications2025
EARLY TEAM BASED NEURO-REHABILITATION AFTER MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY: A PILOT STUDY.
Article in Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate study design, procedure, and measurements for future study of early rehabilitation after mild traumatic brain injury. Design: A randomized controlled study was conducted. Subjects/patients: Patients from a county hospital emergency department, diagnosed with mild Traumatic Brain Injury were contacted 2 weeks post-trauma. Methods: Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomized into 2 groups ( Results: Patient-reported outcomes measures showed improvement in both groups for symptoms, physical and activity levels, sleep quality and quantity. Also, improvement in the sub-scales of fatigue and health- related quality of life but worsening for general fatigue and general health at post-test in both groups. Neither group showed improvement for anxiety or depression: the intervention group rated depression higher, and the control group rated anxiety higher, post-test. Conclusion: Design, procedures, measurements and interventions were feasible but need refinement for a full-scale study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.