ArticleBMJ public health2025
Maternal region of birth and stillbirth trends in Victoria, Australia, 2012-2019: a cohort study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Given the increasing attention to reduce stillbirth rates in migrant women and variable clinical guidance, we quantified contemporary trends in stillbirth based on maternal region of birth. Methods: Population-based study of singleton births ≥20 weeks of gestation between 2012 and 2019 from the Victorian Perinatal Data Collection (N=571 998). We investigated the association between maternal self-reported region of birth and stillbirth overall using logistic regression, and gestation and timing of stillbirth using multinomial regression. Trends in stillbirth overall, iatrogenic births, admission to a neonatal intensive care unit or special care nursery, neonatal death and cause of stillbirth by region of birth were also investigated. Results: Rates of stillbirth were significantly higher in women born in Africa (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.76: 1.47 to 2.12) and South Asia (aOR 1.26: 1.11 to 1.43) when compared with locally born non-Indigenous women. For women born in Africa, this was irrespective of gestation, while for women born in South Asia, this was specific to preterm stillbirths. Overall, we observed a decreasing trend in stillbirth among women born in Australia, while the stillbirth rate remained consistently higher and did not significantly decrease in women born in Africa, Oceania, New Zealand and South Asia. Over the same period, iatrogenic births significantly increased. Causes of stillbirth also differed by maternal region of birth. Conclusions: While we observed some improvements in stillbirth rates and increasing rates of iatrogenic birth, maternal region of birth remains an independent risk factor for stillbirth requiring targeted approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.