ArticleBMJ public health2025
Improving measurement of girls and young women's reproductive experiences: qualitative findings from research in Kenyan family planning clinics.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Girls and young women's reproductive health and autonomy are shaped by multiple interconnected factors. Quantitative research, including widely used measurement scales, may overlook or misrepresent key dimensions of girls and young women's experiences, limiting our ability to understand, characterise and advance their reproductive health and rights. Strengthening measurement tools can yield deeper insights and drive more effective policies and programmes. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study exploring girls and young women's (aged 15-19 years) experiences accessing and using family planning services and contraceptive methods in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. This included reflexive thematic analysis of 35 in-depth interviews and seven focus group discussions (FGDs) with 42 girls and young women, along with five FGDs with 27 family planning clinic providers. Results: We identified three dimensions of girls and young women's family planning experiences that challenge existing reproductive health scales. First, reproductive intentions were complex. Second, with support, girls and women asserted their agency and resisted barriers to autonomy. Third, health policies, clinic infrastructure, cultural, religious and social beliefs, and key institutional actors-such as healthcare providers and teachers-inhibited girls and young women's contraceptive access and use. Conclusions: Qualitative insights can help refine existing scales and guide the development of new ones. Scales should strive to capture diverse reproductive intentions, acknowledge agency and resistance and account for structural and systemic influences. Alongside expanded qualitative research, improving quantitative approaches will yield more person-centred, holistic and context-inclusive insights into girls and young women's reproductive health and lives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.