Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41141298›Full record

ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2025

Leveraging blue spaces for public health: Co-creating a whole-system action plan.

Niamh Smith, Michail Georgiou, Deryck Irving, Sebastien Chastin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Niamh SmithSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK.
Michail GeorgiouUrban Big Data Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Deryck IrvingHydro Nation Chair Research & Innovation Programme, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
Sebastien ChastinSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: •To co-create evidence-based, whole-system recommendations for leveraging blue spaces to enhance public health.•To highlight the salutogenic and equigenic benefits of blue spaces.•To guide decision-makers and practitioners in preserving, revitalising and using urban blue spaces for synergistic benefits to people and the planet. Study design: Systems based co-creation. Methods: 1)Establish an evidence base through extensive mixed-methods academic research over six years on the health benefits of urban blue spaces.2)Partner with a water-focused national research and innovation program to incorporate policy expertise and reduce siloed working.3)Co-create an action plan with stakeholders using system-based participatory research, following the DISCOVER framework. Results: The full system map consists of 137 variables and 220 causal linkages. The system map is structured around four core mechanisms that illustrate how urban blue spaces influence health: promoting physical activity, fostering social interaction, supporting a healthy environment, and reducing population stress. Conclusions: Four strategic objectives identified, achievable through 12 policy actions. Blue spaces offer significant health benefits that have historically been overlooked in regeneration projects. The co-created recommendations provide a comprehensive guide for decision-makers and practitioners to maximise the health benefits of blue spaces. Implementing these recommendations can lead to synergistic benefits for both people and the planet.

Indexed as

Blue spaceCo-benefitsCo-creationPolicy formulationPublic healthSystems mapping

Identifiers

PMID41141298
PMCPMC12550573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.