Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41141220›Full record

ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2025

Protecting our frontline: vaccination policies for health care workers in the Americas.

Pamela Burgos, Marcela Contreras, Ignacio Castro, Martha Velandia-González, Daniel Salas, Jennifer Brustrom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pamela BurgosPan American Health Organization Comprehensive Immunization Program Washington, DC United States of America Pan American Health Organization, Comprehensive Immunization Program, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Marcela ContrerasPan American Health Organization Comprehensive Immunization Program Washington, DC United States of America Pan American Health Organization, Comprehensive Immunization Program, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Ignacio CastroPan American Health Organization Comprehensive Immunization Program Washington, DC United States of America Pan American Health Organization, Comprehensive Immunization Program, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Martha Velandia-GonzálezPan American Health Organization Comprehensive Immunization Program Washington, DC United States of America Pan American Health Organization, Comprehensive Immunization Program, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Daniel SalasPan American Health Organization Comprehensive Immunization Program Washington, DC United States of America Pan American Health Organization, Comprehensive Immunization Program, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Jennifer BrustromBiostat Global Consulting Worthington, Ohio United States of America Biostat Global Consulting, Worthington, Ohio, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This paper explores vaccination policies for health care workers (HCWs) in effect in all 35 Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) countries plus the British territory of Anguilla to highlight strengths and challenges within the region and inform relevant policies and interventions. Methods: Data were collected in two phases. Phase 1 (March-September 2021) was conducted as part of a global survey examining characteristics of national vaccination policies for HCWs. The questions addressed policy enforcement, antigens included in policies, funding, vaccination monitoring, and emergency vaccination plans. Respondents were representatives from 21 countries. In Phase 2 (March-August 2023), 15 country representatives who did not respond to the initial survey completed an amended, web-based version of the original questionnaire. Results: Of the 36 countries, 15 (42%) reported having a national HCW vaccination policy, and 3 (8%) planned to introduce one within 5 years. Among those with policies, 80% integrated them into occupational health regulations. All policies covered influenza and hepatitis B, while many also included tetanus, measles, rubella, diphtheria, and COVID-19. Over half of respondents had emergency vaccination mechanisms, and 44% reported national monitoring systems. Ten countries had comprehensive vaccination policies for HCWs. Conclusions: To strengthen HCW vaccination policy in the Americas, future efforts should support countries in developing tailored national policies, expanding antigen coverage-especially for outbreak-prone diseases-and investing in strong monitoring systems. Additionally, scaling up behavioral research, enhancing communication strategies, and institutionalizing emergency mechanisms will be critical for addressing vaccine hesitancy and ensuring both pandemic preparedness and routine care continuity.

Indexed as

health personnelhealth policyimmunizationoccupational healthVaccination

Identifiers

PMID41141220
PMCPMC12551428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.