ReviewBreast cancer (Dove Medical Press)2025
Exploring AI Approaches for Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis: A Review Article.
Review in Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A cross data learning architecture for breast cancer classification using mammograms.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Approaches for the Detection, Classification, and Surveillance of Viral Pathogens: Current Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Vision-Language Models in Medical Imaging for Cancer Diagnosis: A Bibliometric Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- A Novel Hybrid CNN-ViT-Based Bi-Directional Cross-Guidance Fusion-Driven Breast Cancer Detection Model.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven multimodal fusion for precision diagnosis and personalized management of breast cancer.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
- Radiomics and Deep Learning: Bridging Breast Cancer Imaging Phenotypes and Genomic Heterogeneity.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Review
- A dialectical lens for AI and medical humanities: advancing responsible augmented humanism in Digital Public Health.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Performance of an Artificial Intelligence Support System on Screening Mammography Cases Proceeding to Stereotactic Biopsy.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning, is reshaping breast cancer diagnostics in the radiology and pathology fields. This review synthesizes recent advances in mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), ultrasound, MRI, and whole-slide imaging, with an emphasis on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), Vision Transformers (ViTs), and generative adversarial networks (GANs). When embedded within established screening and diagnostic workflows, AI systems can enhance lesion detection and triage, as well as reduce interpretive variability. However, performance and generalizability depend on dataset quality, population and vendor heterogeneity, acquisition protocols, and calibrated probability outputs; diminished performance on external datasets and miscalibration remain recurrent risks that require explicit mitigation during development and deployment of these models. Beyond detection and classification, segmentation and risk prediction models increasingly integrate imaging with clinicopathological and, where available, genomic variables to enable individualized risk stratification and follow-up planning. Data generation strategies, including GAN-based augmentation, can partially address data scarcity and class imbalance but require rigorous quality control and bias monitoring. Persistent barriers to clinical adoption include uneven external validation, domain shifts across institutions, variability in reporting standards, limited interpretability, and ethical, privacy, and regulatory constraints. Overall, AI should augment, rather than replace, the role of clinicians. Priorities for responsible integration include multi-site prospective evaluations, transparent and standardized reporting, bias mitigation, robust calibration, and lifecycle monitoring to ensure sustained safety and equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.