Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41141190›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Assessing Gluten-Induced Brain Fog in a Non-celiac Patient: A Case Report.

David Oakley, Frank Palermo

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David OakleyMedical Physics, WAVi Med, Boulder, USA.
Frank PalermoTrauma, University of Colorado, Denver, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While gluten-induced brain fog is frequently reported in individuals with celiac disease, it is uncertain whether people without classic gastrointestinal symptoms of celiac may also experience similar gluten-related cognitive issues. These types of subjective complaints are difficult to quantify in clinical practice, but electroencephalography (EEG) with event-related potentials (ERPs) can be useful in identifying cognitive disturbances. The case we present here is of a 28-year-old male who reported mild cognitive symptoms associated with gluten exposure, not previously objectively evaluated. His evaluation included reaction time, trail-making, and auditory ERP assessments - modalities sensitive to conditions associated with cognition. His initial test was performed after three weeks on a normal gluten-containing diet. After this gluten exposure, the patient reported "brain fog," which was supported by a low P300, the cognitive component of the ERP, even though he still tested strongly in reaction time and trail making. The patient was tested again after three weeks on a gluten-free diet. After eliminating gluten, the patient reported no brain fog, and this was supported by a P300 that was no longer suppressed. While this single case study cannot address causation, the ERP deficits observed in this patient were consistent with the reported "brain fog." Objective modalities such as EEG with P300 can be readily added to the clinical assessment to aid clinicians in testing hypotheses, including situations where elimination diets are considered to address cognitive concerns.

Indexed as

cognitive fatigueconcussioncovidelectroencephalogramevent related potentialsgluten-induced brain fog

Identifiers

PMID41141190
PMCPMC12548974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.