ArticleCureus2025
Adequacy of Head CT Scan Request Form Completion for Non-trauma Neurological Cases at a Teaching Hospital in Baghdad, Iraq: A Clinical Audit.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective To determine whether the clinical and demographic data recorded on head CT scan request forms for patients with non-trauma neurological issues at the Baghdad Teaching Hospital emergency department are adequate, and to explore if the process of completing radiology request forms can be improved through specific interventions. Methodology A clinical audit was conducted in two cycles. Data were collected from head CT request forms for patients presenting with suspected non-traumatic neurological issues to the emergency room. In the first cycle, data were gathered retrospectively over one month in January 2025. The data were reviewed and analyzed, and then interventions were implemented to enhance quality. The second cycle took place over one month (April 2025) to objectively evaluate the success of these interventions by comparing the adequacy of relevant information before and after their implementation. Results Four hundred one patients were included in the first cycle, with 65.58% of their requests having inadequate clinical information. After implementing the interventions, 30.28% of the 383 patients in the second cycle had insufficient clinical information. The patient demographics were mainly complete, except for age and the time and date of the CT scan request, which showed significant improvement. Conclusion The audit study reveals that the implemented interventions significantly improved the radiology request forms by ensuring they contain adequate demographic and clinical information. Ongoing efforts are essential to sustain good practices in completing the radiology request forms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.