ArticleCureus2025
Cross-Body Versus Combined Sleeper Stretch for Posterior Shoulder Tightness: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Posterior shoulder tightness (PST) is common in young overhead athletes and may increase the risk of shoulder injury. Cross-body and sleeper stretches are widely used, but their comparative effectiveness remains unclear. Hence, we conducted this study to address that gap in the literature Methods We performed a single-blind randomized controlled trial involving 24 adolescent baseball players (mean age 11.6 years); the participants were randomly assigned to a cross-body group (n = 12) or a combined group (cross-body plus sleeper, n = 12). Both groups performed daily stretching for three weeks. Shoulder range of motion (ROM) (internal rotation (IR), external rotation (ER), horizontal adduction (HA), and total rotation) was measured with a digital inclinometer before and after the intervention. Results Twenty-four participants completed the trial (combined: n = 12; single: n = 12). Both groups showed significant improvements in IR (combined: from 31.7° to 46.0°; single: from 26.9° to 42.0°) and HA ROM (combined: from 83.6° to 94.2°; single: from 82.9° to 91.9°). Total rotation improved significantly only in the combined group (from 104.6° to 123.9°), whereas ER did not change significantly in either group. No significant between-group differences were observed in any outcomes (p>0.05). No adverse events were reported. Post-hoc power analysis indicated that the study may have been underpowered to detect small between-group effects. Conclusions Cross-body stretching, performed alone or with sleeper stretching, is an effective approach for reducing PST in early adolescent baseball players. Level of evidence: 1b (individual randomized controlled trial).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.