ReviewCureus2025
Biomechanical Assessment Tools for Injury Risk Prediction and Return-to-Sport Evaluation in Athletes: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute and Short-Term Effects of Real-Time Feedback Neuromuscular Training on Vertical Jump Performance and Reactive Efficiency in Youth Basketball Players.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Construction of a sports bio mechanical injury prediction and AI warning system based on wearable sensors.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Changes in the mechanical properties of myotonometric muscles following manual therapy during archery: a single-group, single-session repeated measurement study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, particularly non-contact types, remain a major concern for athletes. Biomechanical screening tools such as 3D motion capture and force plates have advanced risk assessment and return-to-sport evaluation, yet their predictive validity and clinical applicability across diverse athletic populations remain unclear. This systematic review, conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searched four databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science) up to July 25, 2025, and included original studies assessing athletes with biomechanical tools for injury risk or return-to-sport readiness. Of 4,787 records identified, eight studies met the criteria. Most utilized motion analysis or force plates to evaluate landing kinematics, limb symmetry, and postural control. Key findings showed that reduced quadriceps strength symmetry, psychological unreadiness, and compensatory kinematic deviations were strongly associated with delayed or unsafe return-to-sport. While sagittal-plane metrics demonstrated high reliability, coronal and transverse measures were less consistent, and proprietary force-plate scores, such as Sparta Science metrics, showed limited predictive value unless used within multifactorial frameworks. Overall, biomechanical assessments provide meaningful insights into injury risk and rehabilitation progress, particularly when emphasizing strength symmetry and kinematic consistency, but reliance on single metrics or composite scores without contextual interpretation may restrict clinical utility. Future research should focus on longitudinal designs and standardized protocols to enhance predictive accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.