ReviewCureus2025
From Brudzinski to Jamil: Unveiling Classical and Emerging Clinical Signs of Meningitis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meningitis can result from bacterial, viral, fungal, or noninfectious causes and requires early recognition to reduce both death and long-term complications. While laboratory testing and imaging confirm the diagnosis, bedside examination remains pivotal in guiding initial clinical decisions. This narrative review summarizes the main clinical signs of meningitis, both classical and more recently described, and discusses their diagnostic value. A structured literature search was conducted across major medical databases and sources, focusing on physical signs rather than laboratory or imaging approaches. Classic signs such as Kernig's and Brudzinski's are well recognized but limited by variable sensitivity. Other bedside maneuvers, including jolt accentuation and less commonly used signs, provide additional diagnostic context. Emerging signs, such as Jamil's sign, highlight the potential for improved detection of subtle meningeal irritation. Although no single sign can confirm or exclude meningitis with certainty, combining several findings with careful clinical judgment enhances diagnostic accuracy. In resource limited settings, bedside signs remain especially critical where access to imaging and laboratory confirmation may be delayed. Training clinicians in the correct interpretation and performance of these signs, and incorporating these into practice, can improve patient outcomes while strengthening early diagnosis. Future work should continue to validate emerging signs across diverse populations and encourage uniform examination protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.