ReviewCureus2025
Microvascular Outcomes of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Retinopathy and Nephropathy Evidence.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review evaluated randomized controlled trials examining the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists on microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes, focusing on diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy. Four eligible RCTs, enrolling over 27,000 patients with follow-up periods ranging from 32 weeks to 5.4 years, were included. GLP-1 receptor agonists consistently demonstrated renal protective effects, primarily driven by reductions in new or worsening nephropathy and macroalbuminuria, with more modest and inconsistent effects on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline. In contrast, their impact on retinopathy remained inconclusive. A transient signal of worsening retinopathy has been reported in the context of rapid glycemic improvement; however, across large outcome trials, effects on retinopathy have been inconsistent and remain inconclusive. Overall, the evidence for retinopathy risk is limited by small event numbers, heterogeneity in assessments, and exploratory analyses. The certainty of renal benefit was strengthened by rigorous trial designs and low risk of bias, whereas retinopathy outcomes were generally secondary and less robust. These findings suggest that GLP-1 receptor agonists can be prioritized for patients at high renal risk, but careful monitoring of individuals with pre-existing retinopathy remains warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.