ArticleCureus2025
Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: A Tale of Two Cases Highlighting Rare Subtypes and Diagnostic Considerations.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) comprises a group of rare connective tissue disorders marked by multisystem involvement and considerable clinical variability. This report presents two cases of young individuals with complex medical histories involving joint hypermobility, musculoskeletal deformities, ocular abnormalities, and unexplained cardiovascular symptoms. Both cases were initially misclassified under more common subtypes of EDS. However, comprehensive clinical evaluation and application of updated classification criteria led to a re-evaluation of the initial diagnoses. These cases highlight the diagnostic challenges posed by EDS and emphasize the need for heightened clinical suspicion and systematic assessment when encountering atypical presentations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.