Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41141033›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Spontaneous Fragmentation and the Disappearing JJ Stent: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.

Khaled Ghanem, Shady Hegab, Junaid Masood

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Khaled GhanemDepartment of Urology, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, London, GBR.
Shady HegabDepartment of Radiology, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, London, GBR.
Junaid MasoodDepartment of Urology, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When double J urinary stents are "forgotten," their constituent polymers undergo mechanical and chemical degradation. This process can lead to potentially serious complications, such as encrustation or fragmentation. Fragmented and degraded stents are often more difficult to remove, frequently requiring complex surgical procedures. We present two cases of ureteric stents that were left in place for more than three years. In one case, a complicated ureteroscopy was required to remove the stent in numerous pieces. In the other case, the stents fragmented over time and completely disappeared; the patient denied experiencing stenturia. We review the evidence to identify the potential mechanisms leading to stent fracture and suggest possible preventive strategies.

Indexed as

complicationendo urologypreventionspontaneous fragmentationureteric stent

Identifiers

PMID41141033
PMCPMC12552024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.