Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41141028›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Focused Assessment With Sonography in Trauma (FAST) as a Prognostic Tool in Blunt Abdominal Trauma: A Prospective Observational Study.

Daniel E, Srinivasan C, Karthikeyan Selvaraj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel EDepartment of General Surgery, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Srinivasan CDepartment of General Surgery, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Karthikeyan SelvarajDepartment of General Surgery, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) is a significant contributor to trauma-related morbidity and mortality globally. While Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) is widely utilized for early diagnosis, its role in predicting patient outcomes requires further evaluation. Methods A prospective observational study involving 80 BAT patients was conducted at a tertiary trauma center over 18 months. All patients underwent FAST at admission. Correlations between FAST results and clinical outcomes such as surgical intervention, ICU stay, morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay duration were assessed. CT was used as the diagnostic gold standard. Statistical analyses included sensitivity, specificity, logistic regression, and comparison of outcome variables. Results Out of 80 patients, 36 (45%) had a positive FAST. FAST showed a sensitivity of 79.1%, specificity of 94.6%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 94.4%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 79.5% compared to CT. Surgical intervention (72.2% vs. 9.1%), ICU admission (50% vs. 11.3%), morbidity (38.9% vs. 6.8%), and mortality (13.9% vs. 2.3%) were significantly higher in FAST-positive patients (p<0.001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in FAST-positive patients (10.2 ± 3.8 vs. 6.1 ± 2.9 days, p<0.001). Conclusion FAST is an effective prognostic tool in BAT. A positive FAST result strongly correlates with adverse outcomes and supports early triage, surgical planning, and ICU utilization.

Indexed as

abdominal blunt traumafast (focused assessment with sonography for trauma)mortalitytriageultrasound imaging

Identifiers

PMID41141028
PMCPMC12550216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.