Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41140999›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Unicuspid Aortic Valve Disease: The Role of Imaging in Diagnosis and Timely Surgical Planning.

Mehak Gupta, Aaditya Kodamanchile, Marina Zafeiri, Pavithralakshmi Venkatraghavan, Andrew Cole

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mehak GuptaDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, GBR.
Aaditya KodamanchileDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, GBR.
Marina ZafeiriDepartment of Medicine, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, GBR.
Pavithralakshmi VenkatraghavanDepartment of Medicine, Hereford County Hospital, Hereford, GBR.
Andrew ColeDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unicuspid aortic valve (UAV) is a rare congenital anomaly that is often misdiagnosed as bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). UAV is associated with faster clinical progression, earlier need for surgical intervention, and a higher risk of complications. Accurate diagnosis is therefore crucial for timely management. We report the case of a 31-year-old male with a family history of BAV, who had been followed for more than 15 years with a presumed diagnosis of BAV. Serial transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs) and cardiac MRI consistently suggested a bicuspid morphology. A previous transesophageal echocardiogram (TOE) was poorly tolerated. Despite progressive aortic regurgitation and root dilation, the diagnosis remained unchanged until the patient developed exertional dyspnea and presyncope. A repeat TOE revealed a unicuspid valve with severe eccentric regurgitation, which was later confirmed intraoperatively during aortic valve replacement with concomitant ascending aortic surgery. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of UAV, the limitations of TTE and MRI in assessing valve morphology, and the pivotal role of TOE. Early clinical suspicion and timely multimodal imaging are essential to avoid delayed recognition and to optimize surgical planning and outcomes.

Indexed as

aortic valve replacementcardiac mritransesophageal echocardiogramtransthoracic echocardiogramunicuspid aortic valve

Identifiers

PMID41140999
PMCPMC12550531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.