ReviewCureus2025
Attitudes of Pediatric Nursing Staff Regarding Parental Presence During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review examines the attitudes of pediatric nursing staff toward parental presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), highlighting both international perspectives and findings from the Greek healthcare context. A thematic analysis of existing Greek and international literature was conducted using databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), with studies selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria focusing on pediatric CPR, healthcare professionals' attitudes, and the presence of parents during resuscitation. The studies reviewed support the inclusion of parents during pediatric resuscitation, reporting emotional, ethical, and psychological benefits for families. Pediatric nurses, in particular, tend to be more supportive of parental presence compared to their counterparts in adult care. This reflects a stronger alignment with family-centered care models. However, significant barriers remain, including institutional resistance, lack of formal guidelines, and insufficient staff training, especially in Greece. We also found that the majority of nursing staff reported having no personal experience with the presence of family during resuscitation and expressed disagreement with allowing parents to be present. Concerns about team performance and parental distress are also reported, though these are often mitigated by clear communication, staff preparation, and structured support roles. Overall, parental presence during pediatric CPR offers meaningful benefits when implemented within a supportive institutional framework. Targeted education, culturally sensitive communication, and the empowerment of pediatric nurses are essential to facilitate this practice. Adopting evidence-based policies and enhancing interdisciplinary collaboration can further promote ethically sound and family-centered resuscitation care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.