Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41140979›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Infection, Healing, and Cost in Open Fractures: A Review of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy.

Chan Khin, Olive Kyaw

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chan KhinTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, GBR.
Olive KyawTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex open fractures present substantial challenges, including infectious complications, healing delays, and functional impairment. Sub-atmospheric pressure therapy has gained adoption as a supplementary treatment modality, despite ongoing debate regarding its clinical efficacy. A focused literature search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library (1997-2025). Randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, and systematic reviews on negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in open fractures were prioritised. Outcomes of interest included infection rate, healing time, flap/graft requirement, reoperation rate, and cost-effectiveness. Early randomised and cohort studies demonstrated reduced deep infection rates with NPWT compared with standard dressings. Pooled analyses demonstrated reduced infection and flap failure rates, although union times and reoperation rates showed no consistent benefit. The WOLLF multicentre trial found no improvement in long-term functional outcomes, and an accompanying economic analysis questioned cost-effectiveness. NPWT appears most useful in severe open fractures with significant soft-tissue loss, where it may reduce infection and assist in temporary wound management. Its role in routine use remains controversial, and further high-quality studies are needed to clarify patient selection and long-term cost-effectiveness.

Indexed as

bone healingcost-benefit analysisfracture fixationnegative-pressure wound therapyopen fractureorthopaedics proceduressoft tissue injuriessurgical wound infectionvacuum-assisted closure (vac)

Identifiers

PMID41140979
PMCPMC12549022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.