ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Children and young people's experiences of receiving group metacognitive therapy: Thematic analysis of a transdiagnostic treatment for common mental health problems.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mental health problems in children and young people (CYP) are increasing with a pressing need for more effective treatments. However, the development of psychological interventions seldom explores young patients experiences of treatment, which is crucial in understanding factors influencing the uptake, impact and validity of therapy. We aimed to explore for the first time CYP experiences of how they received group metacognitive therapy for anxiety disorders and depression. Methods: A qualitative study was embedded in a larger feasibility RCT (n=95) comparing group-based MCT with treatment as usual. Seventeen CYP aged 11-17yrs who had been part of the group-MCT arm consented to participate. Interviews were semi-structured, open-ended and followed an a-priori guide. Coding and analysis adhered to guidelines for reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Three overarching themes emerged in patient experiences: treatment fidelity, treatment delivery, and experiences of homework. Treatment fidelity had two subthemes: i) treatment receipt- which included patients understanding of MCT and performance of MCT techniques during the intervention, and ii) treatment enactment- which included performance of MCT techniques in applied settings, plus perceived benefits of treatment. Treatment delivery included two subthemes; i) format of therapy and, ii) therapist characteristics. Conclusions: The results support the use of MCT in children and young people with mixed anxiety disorders and depression. Patients reported understanding the treatment rationale and benefiting from the intervention. They described, consistent with purported mechanisms, how treatment helped them make a shift in beliefs about thoughts and see worry as powerless and under personal control. Patients described an ability to apply specific techniques in real-life settings, despite noting major challenges with homework compliance. The results emphasised areas that might be improved and important recommendations are made for MCT delivery and practise in children and adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.