ArticleDialogues in health2025
Overhearing hushed voices: Using unobtrusive methods to uncover the work-related sentiments of people with epilepsy.
Article in Dialogues in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Despite high unemployment and discrimination, disability is often overshadowed by race and gender in workplace diversity discussions. This study sought to uncover the work-related sentiments of people with epilepsy (PWE) in their own voices. Epilepsy is a stigmatized invisible disability wherein first-person accounts are difficult to uncover because of stigma. Hence, the discussion on accommodation, inclusion and access for PWE is driven by others, rather than people with epilepsy. By hearing from PWE, workplace solutions can be more relevant to their needs. Design: We use unobtrusive data mining of discussions by PWE by studying anonymous posts on the Epilepsy Foundation community forum over a 16-year period. We examine their sentiments, beliefs, and emotions impacting work for people with epilepsy (PWE), and analyzed perceptions of discrimination to understand what organizations can do better to be inclusive and supportive at work. Findings: We found that PWE sentiments around work were more positive compared to nonwork sentiments. Their work sentiments were analytical, achievement oriented and associated with positive emotions. Work was associated with love and affiliation. However, PWE posts were broadly also more anxious, health centered and tentative reflecting their fears around their health and stigma in employment. Originality: This study is unique in using unobtrusive data mining techniques to analyze the challenges faced by people with disabilities. To our knowledge, there is no such study of adults with epilepsy and the workplace. The methodology used reduces response bias. Questions about disability are difficult to answer for people who face stigma around their disability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.