ArticleDialogues in health2025
Impact of philanthropic investment on integrating social determinants of health into diabetes care at US federally qualified health centers.
Article in Dialogues in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study objective: Assess the impact of a change in a philanthropic funding strategy toward focusing on the inclusion of responses to the social determinants of health (SDOH) in diabetes care. Design: Retrospective analysis of routinely collected clinical and social determinants of health data. Setting: Federally Qualified Health Centers Across the United States who were selected to receive funding after applying. Participants: People living with diabetes who received care support that was partially or wholly supported from philanthropic funding provided by Direct Relief. Interventions: The primary intervention was the injection of funding from Direct Relief to support the integration of interventions responsive to the SDOH. Example interventions include referral to SDOH support, home based monitoring, inclusion of community health workers, virtual care, and community-based care. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was the change in HbA1c from baseline to two to four months for all patients contributing data. Results: Participants in the HBHC program demonstrated a reduction in glycosylated hemoglobin of -1.25 points ([95 % CI, -1.45 - -1.06], Conclusion: Future philanthropically supported efforts should encourage integration of SDOH interventions into clinical services for under-resourced patients living with diabetes. Additional prospective, controlled studies should be completed to more definitively determine the impact of investment on specific interventions designed to respond to the most frequently encountered SDOH needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.