ArticleRevista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)
Occlusal contact area changes with different retention protocols using T-Scan III: An observational study.
Article in Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The retention phase in orthodontics is essential for maintaining corrected occlusion and preventing relapse. Clear retainers like Essix are popular for their aesthetics and affordability, but their occlusal coverage might impact anterior and posterior contacts. Modified versions, such as Occless Essix, have been introduced to address these concerns. The aim of this study was to compare occlusal changes over time between Essix and Occless Essix retainers using the T-scan III system. Materials and Methods: This analytical observational study involved 30 orthodontic patients treated with MBT 0.022-inch brackets and first premolar extractions. Patients were divided into two groups: one with Essix retainers and the other with Occless Essix retainers. Occlusal contacts and their intensities in anterior and posterior regions were recorded immediately after debonding (T0) and three months later (T1) using the T-scan III system. Statistical analysis used Mann-Whitney, T-test, and Chi-square tests, with significance set at 5%. Results: After three months, the Occless Essix group showed increased posterior contact intensity and a slight decrease in anterior contact intensity. Conversely, the Essix group had increased anterior contact intensity and decreased posterior contact intensity. These changes were not statistically significant (P=0.17). The Occless Essix group had an increased number of posterior occlusal contacts and a decreased number of anterior contacts, while the Essix group showed a slight increase in anterior contacts. These changes were not statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: There were no significant differences between Essix and Occless Essix retainers regarding changes in occlusal force intensities or the number of occlusal contacts after three months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.