Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41140929›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2025

Characterizing Emergency Department Visits for Product-Related Head Injuries in the United States 2014 to 2024.

Nicholas D Soulakis, Annabelle Shaffer, Caroline Hensing, David Gonzalez-Velez, Nathan Pecoraro, Ashley A Peters, Paul M Arnold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicholas D SoulakisDepartment of Health Informatics and Data Science, Parkinson School of Health Sciences and Public Health, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA.
Annabelle ShafferCarle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Caroline HensingCenter for Health Outcomes and Informatics Research, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA.
David Gonzalez-VelezCenter for Health Outcomes and Informatics Research, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA.
Nathan PecoraroDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA.
Ashley A PetersDepartment of General Surgery, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA.
Paul M ArnoldCarle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology of head injuries associated with consumer products presenting to emergency departments (EDs) in the United States. Methods: We included ED visits for head injuries occurring in all ages from 2014 to 2024 from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), a database of consumer product-related injuries occurring in the United States. National estimates were derived from the NEISS statistical weights associated with each ED visit. We calculated the annual national rate of ED visits for head injuries and examined the trends in the crude rates for head injury ED visits across age groups. Temporal analysis identified the dates of significantly more head injury visits than expected. Results: There were 571,438 ED visits for head injuries, representing 15.02% of all ED visits in the NEISS data set from 2014 to 2024. Nationally, injuries occurred most in men (51.11%), White identifying individuals (49.74%), and persons aged younger than 5 years (17.94%). Injuries occurred throughout the year, but April, May, June, and December had the most days where injuries significantly exceeded expectations. Most patients (84.04%) were treated and released from the ED. Internal organ injury was the most common diagnosis across age groups. Conclusion: Head injury rates increased over the study period, with variation by age group. Involved products differed significantly by age group, with organized sports (football, basketball, soccer, and baseball) equipment being common in adolescents and floors/structural items (floors, beds, and stairs) being common in the elderly. These findings can inform public health policy and education.

Indexed as

adolescentsconsumer productsepidemiologygeriatricshead injuryseasonality

Identifiers

PMID41140929
PMCPMC12546781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.