Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41140901›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2026

Can a Natural Image-Based Foundation Model Outperform a Retina-Specific Model in Detecting Ocular and Systemic Diseases?

Qingshan Hou, Yukun Zhou, Jocelyn Hui Lin Goh, Ke Zou, Samantha Min Er Yew, Sahana Srinivasan, Meng Wang, Thaddaeus Wai Soon Lo, Xiaofeng Lei, Siegfried K Wagner and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Benchmarking Vision Encoders for Image Classification in Ophthalmology.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Qingshan HouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Yukun ZhouCentre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jocelyn Hui Lin GohDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Ke ZouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Samantha Min Er YewDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Sahana SrinivasanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Meng WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Thaddaeus Wai Soon LoSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Xiaofeng LeiInstitute of High-Performance Computing (IHPC), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR), Singapore.
Siegfried K WagnerNIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Mark A ChiaNIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Gabriel Dawei YangSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Hongyang JiangDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
An Ran RanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Rui SantosDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stadtspital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Gabor Mark SomfaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stadtspital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Juan Helen ZhouCentre for Sleep and Cognition & Centre for Translational MR Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Haoyu ChenJoint Shantou International Eye Center, Shantou University and the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Qingyu ChenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven.
Carol Y CheungDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Pearse A KeaneNIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Yih Chung ThamDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: DINOv2 is a natural image-based foundation model (FM), pretrained exclusively on 142 million natural images from the LVD-142M data set. In contrast, RETFound is a retina-specific FM, pretrained on ∼3 million images, including natural images, color fundus photos, and OCT images (∼1 million each). Despite DINOv2's massive pretraining data set, its application in ophthalmology and relative performance to domain-specific FMs remain understudied. To address this gap, we conducted a head-to-head comparative evaluation between DINOv2 and RETFound models across a range of downstream ocular and systemic disease tasks. Design: Retrospective head-to-head evaluation. Subjects: Ocular disease detection tasks included diabetic retinopathy (DR), glaucoma, and multiclass eye diseases, whereas systemic disease incidence prediction focused on the 3-year incidence of heart failure, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke. Eight open-source data sets (APTOS-2019, IDRID, MESSIDOR2 for DR; PAPILA, Glaucoma Fundus for glaucoma; JSIEC, Retina, OCTID for multiclass eye diseases) and the Moorfields AlzEye data set (for systemic diseases) were used for fine-tuning and internal testing. External test sets included the same open-source data sets (cross-dataset validation) and the UK Biobank (for systemic diseases). Methods: We replicated the fine-tuning methodology from the original RETFound study on 3 DINOv2 models (large, base, small). All models were fine-tuned on the respective data sets and evaluated through internal and external testing. Main Outcome Measures: Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve and 2-sided t-tests were used to compare models' performances. Results: For ocular disease detection, DINOv2 models generally outperformed RETFound. For DR, DINOv2-Large achieved AUCs of 0.850 to 0.952, exceeding RETFound's 0.823 to 0.944 (all Conclusions: Our findings reveal the merits of DINOv2 in ocular disease detection tasks, whereas RETFound demonstrates an edge in systemic disease incidence prediction. These findings showcase the distinct scenarios where general-purpose and domain-specific FMs excel, highlighting the importance of aligning FM selection with task-specific requirements to optimize clinical performance. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceFoundation modelsOcular diseasesOculomicsRetina

Identifiers

PMID41140901
PMCPMC12548085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.