ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Assessing the Relationship between Foveal Cone Density, Outer Nuclear Layer Thickness and Foveal Morphology.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Henle Fibers Are Organized in Bundles Consistent Between Individuals and Conserved in Primates.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the relationship between foveal cone topography, foveal outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness, foveal morphology, and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area in individuals with normal vision. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Participants: A total of 68 participants with normal vision were included (49 female; 19 male). Methods: Directional OCT images were used to derive ONL thickness measurements. Images of the foveal cone mosaic were obtained using adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy, from which peak cone density (PCD) was measured. Foveal avascular zone area and foveal pit morphology were estimated using OCT angiography images and OCT macular thickness maps, respectively. Main Outcome Measures: Foveal cone density metrics, foveal ONL thickness, foveal pit diameter and volume, and FAZ area. Results: There was a weak positive correlation between maximum ONL thickness and PCD in individuals with normal vision (r = 0.23; Conclusions: Findings suggest that foveal ONL thickness should be used with caution as a clinical biomarker of foveal cone density, at least when measured using current OCT technology. The relationship between foveal pit size and foveal cone density supports possible mechanistic links between the processes that establish these important features of foveal specialization. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.