ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Morphotype stratification of radix entomolaris in mandibular molars.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: Special issue on application of artificial intelligence in oral and craniofacial care.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radix entomolaris (RE), a distolingual supernumerary root in mandibular first molars, presents significant challenges in endodontic treatment due to its complex and variable anatomy. Conventional radiographic techniques often fail to detect such intricacies, increasing the risk of missed canals and treatment failure. Objective: This study aimed to characterize the morphometric complexity of RE using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to develop machine learning (ML) models for classifying root canal morphotypes and predicting anatomical bifurcation. Methods: One hundred extracted mandibular first molars with confirmed RE were scanned using high-resolution CBCT. Morphometric parameters-including canal curvature, cross-sectional area, roundness index (a circularity metric), volumetric size, and root fusion status (fused vs. separate roots)-were extracted at multiple apical levels. These features were used to train supervised and unsupervised ML models. A decision tree classifier predicted bifurcation presence using four anatomical features, while K-means clustering (k = 2) stratified morphotypes. Results: The decision tree classifier achieved an F1-score of 0.87, with a sensitivity of 85.7 % and specificity of 89.4 %. Volumetric canal size was the strongest predictor of bifurcation (AUC = 0.81). K-means clustering identified two morphotypes: simple (round, single orifice) and complex (irregular, bifurcated, or C-shaped canals). Notably, roundness index decreased coronally, and 27 % of samples exhibited mid-root bifurcation. Conclusion: CBCT-derived features, particularly canal volume and curvature, effectively predict RE complexity. The integration of these features into machine learning models provides a clinically valuable framework for morphotype classification and personalized endodontic planning. These findings support the adoption of AI-assisted diagnostics in managing anatomically complex root canal systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.