ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Assessment of the success and survival of full mouth rehabilitations: a 3 year follow up study.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Orthodontic Need Among Adult Patients Seeking Oral Rehabilitation in Craiova.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Rehabilitation of Complex Iatrogenic Prosthodontic Failures: A Case Report on Comprehensive Full-Mouth Reconstruction.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Full mouth rehabilitation (FMR) addresses complex dental issues like tooth wear, cosmetic concerns, and loss of occlusal stability, enhancing both function and aesthetics. This study aimed to evaluate the success and survival of tooth-supported FMR treatments and identify common causes of treatment failure. Methodology: A retrospective analysis of 60 patients who underwent FMR between 2019 and 2021 was conducted. Data were collected from the Dental Information Archiving Software (DIAS) and analyzed using modified USPHS criteria, covering parameters like postoperative sensitivity, anatomical form, and marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, surface texture and recurrent caries. Additional aesthetic and functional discrepancies were also documented. Results: At cementation, all parameters scored 100 % alpha. At 3-year follow-up, slight declines were observed in sensitivity (99.17 % alpha), anatomic form (99.17 % alpha), marginal discoloration (98.88 % alpha), and recurrent caries (99.17 % alpha), with no statistical significance. Marginal adaptation (97.22 % alpha, Discussion: Findings suggest that successful FMR relies on a multidisciplinary approach and advanced CAD/CAM technology, which enhances accuracy and reduces treatment time. However, common aesthetic issues, such as gingival zenith variations, highlight areas for further improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.