ArticleNagoya journal of medical science2025
Incidence and risk factors of cerebrospinal fluid leakage related complications after spinal intradural tumor resection.
Article in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparative analysis of early postoperative outcomes of autologous pericranium versus high-density polypropylene in cranial duraplasty in a tertiary care center in Central India.Chinese neurosurgical journal · 2026Article
- Safety and efficacy of clip-assisted dural closure in spinal and cranial surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Review
- Safety and efficacy of clip-assisted dural closure in spinal and cranial surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a common and serious complication of spinal surgery, particularly after intradural tumor resection. CSF leakage can lead to debilitating headaches, neurological deficits, and other symptoms, with an incidence rate of 0.3%-16%. This study aimed to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of CSF-related complications in patients who underwent spinal intradural tumor surgery. This was a retrospective cohort study including 102 patients who underwent resection of intradural tumors, including ependymomas, astrocytomas, and meningiomas. Data were collected, including patient demographics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes. The extent of CSF accumulation was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. Statistical analyses were performed to identify risk factors for symptomatic CSF leakage. Postoperative CSF accumulation was observed in 94.1% of patients. Among them, 28.1% experienced symptomatic complications, such as severe headache (20.8%), unexplained fever (6.3%), and CSF leakage (3.1%). Patients with larger CSF accumulation, particularly subcutaneous accumulation, had a significantly higher incidence of symptomatic complications, with the highest rate observed in subfascial accumulation cases (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.