Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41140789›Full record

ArticleSexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP2025

Inclusion of LGBTQ+ Individuals in Hong Kong: A Scoping Review.

Eliz Miu Yin Wong, Yiu Tung Suen, Randolph C H Chan, Suchon Tepjan, Peter A Newman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eliz Miu Yin WongGender Studies Programme, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Room 250, 2/F, Sino Building, Hong Kong, China.
Yiu Tung SuenGender Studies Programme, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Room 250, 2/F, Sino Building, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9113-1169
Randolph C H ChanDepartment of Social Work, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Suchon TepjanVOICES-Thailand Foundation, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Peter A NewmanFactor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Discussion on the rights and inclusion of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) individuals in Hong Kong is often based on taken-for-granted socio-cultural norms but not grounded in empirical studies. Methods: A scoping review was conducted to map out the current status of LGBTQ+ inclusion in Hong Kong, with results reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The review captured 1205 unduplicated studies which were scoped to 152 peer-reviewed articles published from 2010 to 2022. Findings were categorised using an adapted Global LGBTI Inclusion Index into six domains: education, economic well-being, family, health, political and civic participation, and personal security and violence. Results: LGBTQ+ individuals in Hong Kong face prevalent exclusion and discrimination across major domains of life, which does material harm to their well-being. This underscores the importance of legal protection and recognition to address the exclusion of LGBTQ+ individuals. Conclusions: Gaps were identified for future research: (a) the need to address understudied domains other than health; (b) the need to focus on understudied populations (lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people); (c) the wide range of terminologies adopted in existing LGBTQ+ research; and (d) lack of representative data. Policy Implications: This review highlights the importance of collecting empirical data and obtaining representative data on the LGBTQ+ population to assess the current situation and progress made in LGBTQ+ inclusion in Hong Kong, and to inform policy changes related to LGBTQ+ rights.

Indexed as

AsiaGender and sexual minoritiesHong KongLGBTQ+ inclusionScoping review

Identifiers

PMID41140789
PMCPMC12549774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.