ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025
Error recovery in wearable robotic Co-Grasping: the role of human-led correction.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Trust in automated systems influences the use and disuse of new technologies. Although recent advances in robotics have improved wearable devices designed to assist in grasping, perfectly reliable systems have yet to be achieved. In this work, we introduce a new strategy for wearable devices called Co-Grasping, where both body power and robotics can contribute to grasping, but the user controls the allocation of the human and robot roles. Methods: Our implementation of a Co-Grasping device successfully allows the human operator to intervene using body power during simulated robot errors, in order to aid in error recovery and continue performing grasping tasks without drops. Results: Here, we also show that the presence of recoverable errors lowers trust perception and increases physical engagement behaviors. However, when the robot becomes reliable once again, trust rebounds and most behavioral metrics return to baseline as well. Discussion: These results indicate that trust in faulty automation can be repaired and that enabling users to assume control over system actuation in response to such faults can prevent errors from negatively affecting overall device function. Facilitating human-led dynamic changes in human and robot role allocation through this Co-Grasping device lays a promising foundation for unique human-robot interactions that promote high performance and where trust can recover quickly, despite existing challenges in developing perfect automated systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.