ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025
Agency-preserving robotic assistance for grasp slip recovery in body-powered prostheses.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Existing studies demonstrate that performance in reaction-based tasks can be improved using external robotic assistance without reducing the user's sense of agency, particularly when assistance is delivered near the user's natural reaction time. This finding has promise for assistive technologies like upper limb prostheses, where agency contributes to long-term use and users' natural slip reflexes are hindered by reduced feedback and proprioception. However, prior studies lack the physical feedback of device movement inherent to many assistive devices like body-powered prostheses or exoskeletons where user and device are physically coupled. In this work, we explore the relationship between robotic assistance, performance, and agency when such feedback is present. We study how the timing of robotic assistance alters performance and agency, as experienced through the feedback of a body-powered transmission. We collect data from twenty participants in a simulated slip reaction task using a custom body-powered prosthesis emulator, with robotic grasp assistance provided at various delays relative to the onset of slip. Results show that, as assistance becomes more aligned with reaction times, agency increases while performance benefits are still obtained, even if users are aware of the assistance and perceive an increase in performance. Our findings suggest that in scenarios where users can physically perceive robotic assistance and its benefits, such as in body-grounded assistive technologies like body-powered prostheses or exoskeletons, temporal alignment between the user and robotic assistance plays a role in both performance and user experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.