Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41140775›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025

Reinventing the wheel: a simulation-aided design of a soft, shape-adapting, lugged wheel for locomotion on sandy terrains.

H Shi, P Klaassen, D L Schott, J Jovanova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H ShiDepartment of Maritime and Transport Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
P KlaassenDepartment of Maritime and Transport Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
D L SchottDepartment of Maritime and Transport Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
J JovanovaDepartment of Maritime and Transport Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Locomotion over granular terrain poses significant challenges for autonomous robotic systems, particularly in coastal regions characterized by loose, shifting sands. To optimize the locomotion on these challenging terrains, a simulation-aided design approach was used to develop a soft, shape-adapting, wheeled locomotion system. A co-simulation framework combining the discrete element method (DEM) and multibody dynamics (MBD) is employed to simulate the locomotion of a wheeled robot on varying sandy soils, covering both dry and wet sandy soil conditions. A shape-adapting wheel design is proposed, incorporating soft, inflatable elements that enable the wheel to transform between lugged and circular configurations. A discretized flexbody approach is adopted to model the interactions between the sandy soil and the soft, flexible bodies of the shape-adapting wheel design. Simulation results demonstrate improved performance of the shape-adapting wheels across a variety of sandy terrains, including slopes and obstacles. Integrating softness into the wheel improves obstacle climbing performance, while a lugged wheel configuration performs particularly well on loose, dry sandy slopes. This DEM-MBD co-simulation further enables efficient evaluation of locomotion strategies without the need for extensive physical prototyping.

Indexed as

DEMgranular terrainlocomotionMBDshape-adapting wheelsimulation-aided design

Identifiers

PMID41140775
PMCPMC12547161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.