ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
Is there a lack of equity, diversity and inclusion in orthopaedic education? - A systematic review.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Trauma & Orthopaedics has failed to progress in promoting equity, diversity and inclusion. Only 7 % of orthopaedic consultants are female, and less than 1 % identify as black. Improved equity, diversity and inclusion within healthcare has shown to improve patient outcomes, innovation and reduce unconscious bias within the specialty. Patients within the NHS face significant disparities in the care they receive, and promoting EDI within orthopaedic education will help address this. Methods: A systematic literature search between 2020 and 2025 was performed to identify any literature. The electronic databases of Medline, EBSCO, Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus were utilized. Studies were screened against strict inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure the literature was relevant and specific to this review. Two independent assessors read the abstracts and full-texts of articles to determine whether or not they were included within this systematic review. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD420251022275). Results: The studies within this systematic review highlighted the absence of female and minority ethnic representation within the orthopaedic specialty. Additionally, several barriers to the implementation of EDI have been addressed. These include: a lack of female role models, a lack of commitment from staff, difficulties changing previous perceptions of the specialty and difficulty changing a lack of cultural sensitivity. Conclusion: Women and minority ethnic groups remain markedly underrepresented in orthopaedics, facing structural and cultural challenges that hinder recruitment and retention. Orthopaedic education plays a key role in preventing these issues, as medical students are often discouraged from pursuing this specialty from the outset. Misconceptions and the absence of diverse role models are key factors in deterring students from under-represented backgrounds from entering the specialty. Promoting a culture of inclusion will help change these perceptions and misconceptions. This will aid in enhanced patient-centred care and better healthcare outcomes for all. Despite growing recognition and awareness of the limited diversity in orthopaedics, there remains a shortage of literature that collates data together. This review does this by critically analysing existing research and offers a comprehensive review of this topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.