ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Mechanical signal-chromatin interactions: molecular networks from nuclear membrane force transmission to epigenetic regulation.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond DNA damage: 3D tumor models and the integrin mechanobiology of radioresistance.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026Review
- Nuclear Lamins: A Molecular Bridge Coupling Extracellular Mechanical Cues to Intranuclear Signal Transduction and Gene Regulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Mechanical forces orchestrate the epigenetic landscape of oral mesenchymal stem/progenitor cell fate in dental and periodontal tissues.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- New Roles of bZIP-Containing Membrane-Bound Transcription Factors in Chromatin Tethering and Karyoptosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cells transmit extracellular physical signals across the membrane into the nucleus through membrane mechanoreceptors (such as integrins, mechanically gated ion channels) and the cytoskeletal network. This process leads to redistribution of nuclear membrane tension and dynamic adjustment of chromatin conformation. This process is a core mechanism for cells to sense the microenvironment and regulate physiological activities. As a key hub for mechanotransduction, the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex cooperates with nuclear lamins through the interaction of SAD1/UNC84 domain containing protein (SUN)-Klarsicht, ANC-1 and Syne homology (KASH) domain proteins. Together, they establish a mechanical conduction pathway across the nuclear membrane, mediating the precise transmission of mechanical signals into the nucleus. This then regulates chromatin spatial arrangement and epigenetic modifications. This review systematically analyzes the transmembrane transduction mechanisms of mechanical stimuli (integrin-focal adhesion signaling axis, force-induced activation of Piezo/Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid (TRPV) family channels, signal integration by primary cilia). It clarifies the rules for force transmission into the nucleus via the cytoskeleton-LINC complex. It reveals the regulatory effects of mechanical force on chromatin three-dimensional topological remodeling and epigenetic modifications. It focuses on organizing the molecular network of the "mechanical stimulus-structural remodeling-epigenetic regulation" cascade. This article aims to provide a theoretical framework for a deeper understanding of the role of mechanical-epigenetic coupling in tissue development and disease progression. It also offers a systematic reference for research in related fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.