ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Identification of routine blood derived hematological and lipid indices in ILD through machine learning; a retrospective case-control study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Accessible Blood Based Biomarkers Reflecting Inflammation-Lipid Dysregulation in Silicosis Progression - Jiangsu Province, China, 2021-2024.China CDC weekly · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) comprises various disorders marked by pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis. Early diagnosis and risk prediction are vital for improving patient outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 603 patients who had visited the Hubin Campus between January 2022 and April 2025, employing a 1:2 case-control design with age- and gender-matched groups. We collected clinical information, complete blood count data, lipid metabolism indicators, and various derived indices. Conclusion: Six key markers were identified through three machine learning algorithms (LassoCV, SVMREFCV, and Boruta): neutrophil percentage, lymphocyte percentage, monocyte percentage, hemoglobin, and two novel ratios - neutrophil-to-HDL-C and lymphocyte-to-HDL-C. The random forest model outperformed seven other machine learning approaches, with AUC values of 0.868 (validation set), 0.885 (test set), and 0.849 (external cohort), demonstrating consistent predictive accuracy. Discussion: Based on these findings, we developed an online prediction tool to assist primary care clinicians in assessing the risk of ILD in suspected cases. Our results indicate that the random forest model exhibits high accuracy and clinical utility for early ILD prediction, providing a novel tool and methodology for early diagnosis and intervention. Future studies will focus on further optimizing the model and validating it in larger multicenter cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.