Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41140661›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Community case study of patient and clinician early engagement in research on multiple chronic conditions using an implementation guide.

Constance van Eeghen, Jennifer O'Rourke Lavoie, Kairn Stetler Kelley, Georgia Brown, Beverly Canin, Juvena Hitt, Kennedy Paron, Tonica Robinson, Hanna Schweitzer, Haley Van Serke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Constance van Eeghen *Department of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
Jennifer O'Rourke Lavoie *Department of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
Kairn Stetler Kelley *Department of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
Georgia BrownDepartment of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
Beverly CaninCancer and Aging Research Group, Duarte, CA, United States.
Juvena HittDepartment of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
Kennedy ParonDepartment of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
Tonica RobinsonDepartment of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
Hanna SchweitzerDepartment of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
Haley Van SerkeDepartment of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This case study describes the CIRCLE (Collaboratively Inspired Research Community for Learning and Engagement) project, which aimed to advance meaningful community engagement in research about multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) by co-creating a research agenda with patients, caregivers, clinicians, and researchers. The project was conducted entirely virtually, utilizing a structured process with engagement tools adapted from a prior Patient Partner Guide. It included three stages: (1) develop the virtual environment and adapt the engagement process and tools, (2) recruit and train co-creators and facilitators to test the process and tools collaboratively and make iterative improvements, and (3) implement these tools in ten-week group sessions. Project participants in the group sessions - adults with or caring for individuals with MCCs - were recruited from a previous national trial. They engaged in interactive activities such as needs assessments related to engagement, Affinity Diagrams, and Shared Lived Experiences. Results demonstrated success in two domains: (1) successful engagement in early stages of collaborative research as measured by recruitment (59 initial participants) and high levels of retention (89%) and participation (100% completion of initial assessment; 78-82% of other assessments and activities; positive qualitative evaluations) and (2) successful completion of a Partnering Guide for Research (PGR) and a prioritized research agenda for MCCs. The project is a demonstration of intentional, structured virtual engagement processes and supportive environments fostering equitable partnerships and trust while producing intended products. The PGR is a replicable implementation guide to be used by other teams seeking to integrate community voices into health research starting with a research agenda.

Indexed as

case studycommunity engagementmultiple chronic conditionspartnering implementation guideresearch agenda

Identifiers

PMID41140661
PMCPMC12549578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.