ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Preoperative inferior vena cava-abdominal aorta ultrasound examination to guide the positioning of spinal anesthesia to reduce post-spinal hypotension: a prospective, randomized trial.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The effectiveness of a 15° left-lateral tilt for alleviating the inferior vena cava (IVC) compression caused by a gravid uterus has been questioned. This study assessed the benefits of conducting pre-spinal anesthesia IVC-abdominal aorta ultrasound examinations and utilizing the IVC to abdominal aorta (IVC/Ao) ratio as a guide for post-spinal anesthesia positioning. Methods: 200 parturients undergoing cesarean section were randomized 1:1 into an ultrasound-guided and a control group (groups U and C, respectively). The parturients in group C were positioned with a 15° left-lateral tilt, while those in group U had the operating table tilted to achieve the maximum IVC:Ao diameter, as determined by preoperative ultrasound, which indicated the maximum IVC:Ao diameter. The primary endpoint was the incidence of hypotension in parturients, defined as the period from the completion of intrathecal drug injection (time A) to when they were placed in the supine position (time B). Secondary outcomes included total vasopressor use, umbilical cord blood parameters (such as the pH and base excess values of the umbilical artery) immediately after birth, and Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min for the neonate. Results: The incidence of hypotension from the end of spinal anesthesia until the supine position was lower in group U (60.8%, Conclusion: Conducting an IVC-abdominal aorta ultrasound examination before spinal anesthesia in parturients and using the IVC/Ao ratio to guide post-spinal anesthesia positioning reduced the incidence and frequency of hypotension as well as the dose of vasopressors required after surgery. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=166587, identifier ChiCTR2200059888.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.